U.S. Political Parties

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

 

Federal Res.

Jurisdiction

Links

Miscellaneous

Money

Parties

Taxes 

9-11

There are hundreds of political Parties in the U.S.A. Here are a few of the more prominent in alphabetical order.

COMMUNIST

Purpose
Control by ownership of everything variant of Socialism to force people to adhere to the principle
Principles
From each according to his ability, to each according to his need as determined by those in control of the monopoly of force of government.
Character
Authoritarian.

Varients: Leninism, Trotskyism and the People's ... Worldwide it is responsible for 110 of the 169 million people murdered murdered by their own governments. It has destroyed the economies of as many countries as it has infected.

Details:

The more social regulations the United States (federal government and terror ties), United States of America or any one of the States in the Union have, the more Socialist is the U.S., U.S.A. or the State in question.

See Peace and Freedom and Democrat.

See also 45 GOALS OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY*

CONSTITUTION

Purpose
Limit federal government to the activities allowed by the organic Constitution.
Principles
Limited government.
Characteristic
Aware of economics, sometimes religious and intent on imposing morality.

DEMOCRAT

Purpose
Tax, spend and regulate to benefit society and restrict economic freedom, and to a lessor degree, personal freedom..
Principles
None.
Characteristic
Authoritarian, ignorant of economics, mystic, confused.

FASCIST

Purpose
Control by regulation of business variant of Socialism to force people to adhere to the principle; extension of mercantilism
Principles
What's good for the nation is what's good for everyone.
Character
Authoritarian.

The National Socialist Party (NAZI) originated as a Labor-Environmentalist coalition. It murdered 20 million people of Polish and Jewish descent, Gypsies and homosexuals, and initiated World War II, resulting in the death of millions more and the destruction of Europe and half of the Soviet Union.

The more business regulations the United States (federal government and terrories), United States of America or any one of the States in the Union have, the more Fascist is the U.S., U.S.A. or the State in question.

See Green and Republican.

GREEN

Purpose
Tax, spend and regulate to benefit the symbiotic relationship between environmental organizations and their bureaucratic benefactors, and restrict economic and personal freedom
Principles
Despise civilization, particularly automobiles. Exterminate all human beings but themselves.
Character
Arrogant, ignorant of science, mystic, Chicken Little.

INDEPENDENT

Purpose
De-tax, de-spend and de-regulate unless it restricts trade or immigration to benefit non-competitive workers.
Principles
Extort higher than market wages from consumers.
Character
Crusty. Religious.

LIBERTARIAN

Purpose
De-tax, de-spend and de-regulate to benefit everyone except the parasites.
Principles
No initiation of force.
Character
Intelligent, informed, lassie faire, wordy, often Objectivist, sometimes Anarchist

NATURAL LAW

Purpose
Sell health foods.
Principles
Good health is key to peace.
Character
Can afford to be into organic. Single issue.

PEACE AND FREEDOM

Purpose
Socialist/Feminist, tax, spend and regulate to benefit women and restrict economic freedom.
Principles
Whatever Karl Marx or Castro says.
Character
Ignorant of economics except disadvantage of government bonds, utopian, confused.

PROGRESSIVE

Purpose
Tax, spend and regulate to benefit society and restrict economic and personal freedom.
Principles
None.
Characteristic
Arrogant, authoritarian, ignorant of economics, mystic, confused.

REFORM

See Independent.

REPUBLICAN

Purpose
Tax, spend and regulate to benefit mercantilists and restrict personal freedom.
Principles
Whatever good book says, unless it conflicts with personal bias.
Character
Authoritarian, often religious.

SOCIALIST

See Communist, Fascist, Progressive, Green, Democrat and now the neocons dominating it, the Republican Party.

The most successful version are the Fabian Socialists, who advocate the gradual perversion of the history, values and government of nations. Cecil Rhodes used his wealth to found circles of power (Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Bildeberg Group, private central bank boards), one hidden with the other to infilgrate government and implement Fabian Socialism. In addition to the Rhodes fortune, starting in 1909, the wealth and influence of the Rockefeller, Ford and Guggenheim Foundations were used for the pupose of establishing a world Socialist government ruled by an Olegarchy of central bankers.

Attempts to use the United Nations for the pupose were replaced with the more gradual approach of instituting regional governments like the European Union, African Union, North American Union, etc., and later merging them into a world government on which G. Edward Griffin is an authority.

OBSTACLES TO THIRD PARTIES

America has a two-party system, but not because of popular demand. The Democrats and Republicans have legislated third parties into irrelevance - using five principal methods: donation limits, reporting laws, campaign subsidies, the Debate Commission, and ballot-access laws.

To give you just two examples of the impact of these hurdles:

In 2000, the Libertarian presidential campaign raised $2.6 million, but $250,000 of that had to be diverted into ballot-access drives in just two states:

Pennsylvania and Arizona. That's money that could have gone into advertising, but instead was of no value in campaign outreach.

In my home state of Tennessee, Republicans and Democrats are listed on the ballot with their party labels. But candidates of any other parties must be listed as "Independent." Thus anyone entering the polling booth determined to vote against the two major parties must know already which third-party candidate to vote for. If he doesn't, he'll be afraid to choose among the "Independents," not knowing which of them might be a Nazi or a Communist.

These are just two examples of the legislative barriers placed in the way of third parties. To list all the various hurdles would fill a good-sized book.

Incumbency - The ability to buy votes and solicit donations with largess, and extort votes and donations with threats of regulations or taxes. This will only be solved when government is restricted to protecting life, liberty and property.

Gerrymandered districts - The ability to disenfranchise at least a third of the voters for Representative and State Senator and Assemblyman offices by creating safe districts where little if any money needs to be spent to win an election. The solution to this winner-take-all problem can be solved with Instant Runoff Elections or Proportional Voting.

Wasted Vote Syndrome - The perversion of voting from expressing your philosophy to getting a person into office to the exclusion of someone else is the source of negative campaining: scaring voters from your opponent to you rather than attract them with your philosophy/platform. It will be solved when people realize that their individual vote will elect or preclude no one.

2004

"This House election was the least competitive in history," according to Rob Richie, who heads the Center for Voting and Democracy.

The House re-election rate was 98 percent. Of 402 incumbents running, only seven were defeated. One of the seven was a first-term congressmen who hadn't built up the incumbent advantages of longer-term members. Four others were caught in Texas redistricting -- two were defeated by other incumbents.

Texas had the lowest re-election rate in the nation, with incumbents going 25-4. One incumbent lost in Georgia, Illinois, and Indiana. All other House incumbents, the entire delegations that chose to run in the other 46 states, went 335 for 335 for 100 percent re-election.

In the Senate, the re-election rate was 96 percent. Only one incumbent -- Minority Leader Tom Daschle -- was defeated.

Sadly, this election wasn't much worse than the norm . . . 98 or 99 percent re-election rates cycle after cycle.

Even columnist David Broder has noticed. He writes that today's congressman has "more job security than the queen of England -- and as little need to seek their subjects' assent." Broder suggests redistricting reform, no longer allowing politicians in state legislatures to draw the district lines for themselves and congressmen.